论文部分内容阅读
清修《全唐文》因所涉广泛又成于众手,故疏漏讹误之处颇多,仅就重出误收者而言,清人劳格、近人岑仲勉及今人陈尚君诸家已指出近百例。笔者在检用《全唐文》的过程中又发现《奉天皇帝长子新平郡王墓志铭》一文重出并互见于常衮、韩述二人目下,本文考定这篇墓志文的作者是常衮,韩述文当是《全唐文》编修者依据伪作拓片重复收录,新修《全唐文》时应将后者剔除。
Qing repair “full Tang Wen” because of the extensive and has become a public hand, so many omissions corruption, only to reclaim the mistakes, Clements Lauge, recent people Cenzan Mian and present Chen Shangjun all have pointed out Nearly 100 cases. In the course of examining “Full Tang Wen”, the author also found an article titled “The epitaph of the Emperor Pingdi of Xintiandi, the emperor of Mukden,” which was rebuilt and interacted with Chang Hsuan and Han Shu. The author of this essay examines the epitaph of this essay as “ , Han Shuwen is a ”full Tangwen“ editors based on pseudo-rubbish repeatedly included, the new ”full Tangwen" should be excluded when the latter.