论文部分内容阅读
近年来,第三人(间接受害人)向法院提起精神损害赔偿的案件在我国越来越多地涌现。对此类案件,受理法院在处理结果上有很大不同,包括是否支持其赔偿请求以及损害赔偿范围上,都存在很多争议。学术界也分歧颇多。文章尝试从社会学角度,对第三人精神损害赔偿的社会限制因素进行了批判分析,认为:第三人精神损害赔偿的制度正当性问题,无论从表层技术原因还是从深层社会原因来看,完全、武断地对此予以否决,至少是有欠公允的。
In recent years, cases of third party (indirect victim) bringing compensation for mental damages to the court have emerged more and more in our country. In such cases, the admissibility of the court varies greatly in its outcome, including the issue of whether to support its claim for compensation and the scope of the damages. There are many controversies. Academia is also quite different. This article tries to make a critical analysis of the social limitation factors of the third person’s mental damage compensation from the sociological point of view, and holds the view that the system legitimacy of the third person’s mental damage compensation, no matter from the superficial technical reasons or from the deep social reasons, Completely or arbitrarily rejected this, at least not fair.