论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨抗菌药物处方和不合理典型处方干预的效果。方法选取朔州市朔城区人民医院2012年7月—2014年4月对抗菌药物使用处方进行干预的门诊急诊抗菌药物处方119张,2011年4月—2012年6月未进行干预的门诊急诊抗菌药物处方119张。对干预前后的119张处方按照本院自编量表抗菌药物使用合理性评价标准进行评价,评价内容包括:用药指征、用药时间、联合用药及给药剂量、途径和次数,评价等级为合理不合理。结果干预前后各类抗菌药物应用率、不合理典型处方率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对抗菌药物处方进行干预措施后,抗菌药物使用指标均符合规范,干预效果明显。
Objective To investigate the effect of prescription of antibacterial drugs and unreasonable prescription intervention. Methods A total of 119 outpatient emergency antibiotics prescriptions were administered from Shuozhou District People’s Hospital of Shuozhou City from July 2012 to April 2014. There were 119 outpatient emergency antibacterials prescriptions interfered with prescription of antimicrobial drugs and from April 2011 to June 2012, 119 prescription drugs. The 119 prescriptions before and after the intervention were evaluated according to the rationality evaluation criteria of antibacterials self-made in our hospital. The evaluation contents include: indication of medication, time of administration, dosage, route and number of administration, rationale of evaluation unreasonable. Results Before and after the intervention, the application rates of all kinds of antimicrobial agents were unreasonable. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion After the prescriptions of antibacterial drugs were intervened, the indexes of antimicrobial agents were in accordance with the regulations, and the intervention effect was obvious.