论文部分内容阅读
文章主要讨论击撞动词与致使移动构式的融合。一般认为strike类动词和hit类动词中只有后者可以与致使移动构式融合。但是关于击撞动词的语料显示,击撞动词没有必要泾渭分明地分成两类,只要情景识解突显击撞动作的效应,而不是击撞工具或身体部位,击撞动作就有可能与致使移动事件连贯,动词与致使移动构式融合。不同的语义特征也使得动词与致使移动事件的变式有不同的连通关系。
The article mainly discusses the combination of smashing verbs and causing mobile construction. It is generally believed that only the latter of the strike-type verb and the hit-type verb can be combined with the resulting mobile configuration. However, the corpus verbs show that it is not necessary to smash verbs into two distinct categories. As long as the situational awareness highlights the effects of a collision action, instead of hitting a tool or body part, the collision action may cause and cause a movement event. Coherence, verbs and convergence of mobile constructs. Different semantic features also make the verbs differently connected to the variants that cause movement events.