论文部分内容阅读
“鲁迅的贡献,与陈独秀的思想开拓、胡适之的学问成就、周作人的文学评论和文艺理论,构成新文化运动四大最具实质性的栋梁架构”。对鲁迅杂文的认识,现下已有些新的突破,但就整体而言,两岸学者的评价还是差异甚迥。基于此,本文将通过分析鲁迅杂文集的情感“分裂”现象、两岸学术人的评价、评价产生原因的探讨几部分展开讨论。学术界已达成共识,以1928年的“革命文学争论”为界,鲁迅的杂文可分为前期和后期两部分。
“The contribution of Lu Xun, and Chen Duxiu’s thought development, Hu Shizhi’s academic achievement, Zhou Zuoren’s literary criticism and literary theory constitute the four most pragmatic pillar structures of the New Culture Movement.” There are some new breakthroughs in understanding Lu Xun’s essays. However, on the whole, the scholars across the Taiwan Strait still differ widely in their evaluation. Based on this, this article will discuss some parts by analyzing the phenomenon of emotion “split ” in the essays of Lu Xun, the evaluation of academicians in both sides of the strait and the reasons for the evaluation. The academic community has reached a consensus. Taking the 1928 Revolutionary Literature Debate as the boundary, Lu Xun’s essay can be divided into two parts: the early period and the later period.