论文部分内容阅读
与大多数对马克思主义经济学和西方经济学的比较分析重在二者的区别甚至对立之处不同,本文重在分析马克思制度经济学与新制度经济学的相通或相近之处。此处所谓相通除了指在某些方法或结论上基本相同以外,更多的是指相统一的、相互补充的、可以继承的甚至可以相互融合的一面。通过本文的比较,笔者想指出,二者在一些重大问题上完全可以相通。因而,如果能将二者融合在一起,也许意味着制度经济学的更高境界,预示着人们对制度及制度演进的认识更为全面、更为科学。
Compared with most of the differences between Marxist economics and western economics, the difference between the two is even different. This article focuses on the analysis of the similarities and differences between Marxist institutional economics and neoinstitutional economics. The term “intercommunication” refers to the fact that in addition to being basically the same in some methods or conclusions, more refers to the one that can be unified, complementary, inheritable, or even interdependent. Through the comparison of this article, I would like to point out that the two can be completely interlinked on some major issues. Therefore, if the two can be combined, it may mean the higher realm of institutional economics, which indicates that people’s understanding of the evolution of institutions and systems is more comprehensive and scientific.