论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨新编图形透视测验的结构效度,明确图形透视测验为空间定向能力测验。方法采用常用的4项空间能力测验(木块连接测验、表面扩展测验、S-M心理旋转测验、方盒比较测验)和修订图形透视测验对197名健康男性大学生(年龄16～22岁,右利手,矫正后视力1.0以上)进行测量,利用因子分析和内省报告法分析其结构效度。结果 5项空间能力测验可提取2因子,木块连接测验、表面扩展测验以及心理旋转测验在因子1上的载荷分别为68.2%、34.0%和68.9%;图形透视测验在因子2上的载荷为79.9%,方盒比较测验在两个因子上均有载荷分别为66.7%和28.8%。内省报告显示图形透视测验加工策略主要为定向描述和图形透视变换策略。结论方盒比较测验、木块连接测验、表面扩展测验以及心理旋转测验应为空间视觉化测验,图形透视测验属于空间定向能力测验。
Objective To investigate the structural validity of the new graphic perspective test and clarify the graphic perspective test as the spatial orientation ability test. Methods A total of 197 healthy male college students (aged 16-22, Right Hand) were enrolled in this study using four commonly used spatial ability tests (block connection test, surface extension test, SM psychological rotation test, square box comparison test) , Corrected visual acuity of 1.0 or above) were measured, and their structural validity was analyzed using factor analysis and introspective reporting. Results The results of five spatial abilities test showed that the load of factor 2 on the factor 1 was 68.2%, 34.0% and 68.9%, respectively. The load on the factor 2 was 79.9%. The box test had loads of 66.7% and 28.8% on the two factors, respectively. Introspection report shows that the processing strategy of graphical perspective test mainly oriented description and perspective transformation strategy. Conclusions Square box comparison test, block connection test, surface extension test and psychological rotation test should be spatial visual test, and graphic perspective test belongs to spatial directional test.