论文部分内容阅读
新闻媒介既履行舆论监督的职责,又能很好地保护自己,得两全其美。这在实际操作中靠什么?应该靠事实的证据铁,若证据不铁,两全其美何以得? 别看这老生常谈不显眼,可在一系列新闻纠纷中,几乎都围绕着证据铁不铁、足不足展开一场场激烈的较量。最终还是看谁的事实证据最铁而取胜。至于什么神通广,实力强,但若拿不出足够的证据,照样也会变得软弱无力,败下阵来。
The media can not only fulfill its duty of supervision by public opinion, but also protect itself well, enjoying the best of both worlds. What should we rely on in fact? Should we rely on the fact that ironclad evidence does not justify the best of both worlds? Do not look at this cliché, but in a series of news disputes, we can find that almost all the evidence around ironclad evidence Start a fierce battle. Ultimately, to see who the fact that the most iron and win the evidence. As to what the magic is, the strength is strong, but if we can not get enough evidence, we will still be weak and defeated.