论文部分内容阅读
德拉.沃尔佩一方面将自由等同于伦理的和形而上学的前提,另一方面将保障自然自由的契约平等等同于人为的和法律的平等,以此论证卢梭关于自由和平等原则的解决方法是先验的,并且已在历史上被资产阶级革命耗尽了。这是对卢梭的一种偏误解读。事实上,自由和平等是卢梭试图对真实历史事实的再现。而自然状态的一去不返导致卢梭借助于理性普遍化自身的公意原则实现道德自由和道德平等。但是,对于卢梭而言,自然仍高于社会。因此,法国大革命的责任并不在于卢梭,而自由和平等的原则也并未被耗尽,只是在法国大革命后它们被更加温和地讨论着。
On the one hand, Della Volpe equates freedom with the premise of ethics and metaphysics, and on the other hand equates the contractual equality of nature and freedom with the equality between man and law, so as to demonstrate Rousseau’s solution to the principle of freedom and equality Is transcendental, and has been depleted by the bourgeois revolution in history. This is a misinterpretation of Rousseau. In fact, freedom and equality are what Rousseau tries to reproduce the true historical facts. The absence of the natural state led Rousseau to realize moral freedom and moral equality through the principle of rational generalization of his own will. However, for Rousseau, nature is still higher than society. Therefore, the responsibility of the French Revolution was not to Rousseau, nor to the principle of freedom and equality, but to be more moderately discussed after the French Revolution.