四个“双轨制”从粗放到精细化的管理转变居民安某诉李沧某医院医疗损害赔偿一案,原告坚称由于医院实施肿瘤切除手术时出现重大失误,致其下肢残疾,然而,两次医疗鉴定的结果均证实院方并不构成医疗事故。参加合议庭的人民陪审员连庆荣此前曾是一名放射科医师,他敏锐地发现医院在手术前未进行肿瘤活检,程序上存有瑕疵。在专业人民陪审员的质疑面前,被告最终认可这一专业意见,主动履行了法律义务,案件顺利结案。2014年以来,李沧法院严格落实陪 Four “double-track system” from extensive to refined management change Residents Anshan Licang a hospital medical damages compensation, the plaintiff insisted that due to the hospital’s implementation of tumor resection surgery a major mistake, resulting in lower extremity disability, however, The results of the two medical evaluations confirmed that the hospital did not constitute a medical incident. People’s juror joining the collegial panel, Lian Qingrong, a former radiologist, was acutely aware that the hospital had not had a tumor biopsy before the operation and that there were procedural flaws. In the face of the questions raised by the professional people’s jurors, the defendant eventually recognized this professional opinion and took the initiative to fulfill its legal obligations and the case was successfully concluded. Since 2014, Li Cang strictly enforced the court