论文部分内容阅读
文艺批评是否应该有某种标准或尺度呢?回答是肯定的。文艺批评从根本上说是对作品的价值的一种估量。要衡量作品的价值,总要有一定的标准或尺度。没有毛泽东同志所说的“艺术科学的标准”,也就不会有科学的文艺批评。鲁迅嘲讽没有一定“圈子”的批评家是“怪汉子”,正因为这违背起码的常识。所以问题并不在于是否要有标准,而在于如何科学地理解它。鲁迅曾经说过:“批评与创作都是实际工作。以过去的经验,我们的批评常常流于标准太狭窄,看法太肤浅。”这句话至今
Should literary criticism have some standard or measure? The answer is affirmative. Literary criticism is fundamentally a measure of the value of a work. To measure the value of the work, there must always be a certain standard or scale. Without Comrade Mao Zedong’s “standard of art science,” there will be no scientific literary criticism. Critics of Lu Xun’s irony that there is no certain “circle” are “strange men” because precisely this runs counter to the common sense. So the question is not whether there is a standard, but how to understand it scientifically. Lu Xun once said: “Criticism and creation are all practical tasks. From past experience, our criticisms often flow to standards that are too narrow and too superficial.”