论文部分内容阅读
通过以我国学生体质健康评价制度的演变和发展为导线,以我国学生体质健康测试项目为切入点,利用文献法、比较法、数理统计法对学生体质健康测试项目中400米跑与50米×8往返跑进行差异性研究。研究结果表明,在同一名学生身上测得的400米跑与50米×8往返跑项目成绩是具有显著性差异的,在学生体质测试项目上规定的五、六年级50米×8往返跑项目不能用400米跑项目进行简单的代替(或替换)。如果用400米跑代替50米×8往返跑进行学生体质测试,可能会造成比较大偏差,从而影响学生体质健康等级判定的准确性。
By taking the evolution and development of Chinese students’ physique health assessment system as the guideline and taking the Chinese students’ physical health test as the starting point, this paper makes use of the method of literature, comparison and mathematical statistics to test the students’ 8 round-trip run for the difference study. The results show that the same student measured in the 400-meter run and 50-meter × 8 round-trip results are of significant differences in the students’ physical test items prescribed fifth and sixth grade 50 × 8 round-trip run You can not simply replace (or replace) a 400-meter run. If 400 m run instead of 50 m × 8 run back and forth to carry out student physique test, may result in relatively large deviation, thus affecting the accuracy of the students to determine the level of physical fitness.