论文部分内容阅读
目的:调查了解特种兵某部士兵人格特征与心理健康水平。方法:随机抽取特种兵某部士兵379例,采用艾森克个性问卷(EPQ)和症状自评量表(SCL-90)对其人格特征与心理健康水平进行测评,并与中国军人常模比较。结果:某部士兵全体、一级士官组、二级及以上士官组内外向(E)、精神病性(P)、神经质(N)因子,义务兵E、P因子分值,均非常显著高于中国军人常模(P<0.01);士兵全体、义务兵、一级士官组、二级及以上士官组掩饰性(L)因子分值与中国军人常模比较,均差异不显著(P>0.05)。某部士兵全体、义务兵组和二级及以上士官组躯体化、强迫症状、人际关系敏感、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、恐怖、偏执和精神病性等9个因子分值,均非常显著高于中国军人常模(P<0.01);除躯体化、焦虑因子分值外,一级士官组强迫症状、人际关系敏感、抑郁、敌对、恐怖、偏执和精神病性等7个因子分值,均非常显著高于中国军人常模(P<0.01)。结论:特种兵某部士兵人格特征一般,心理健康水平较低,应进行有针对性的心理干预。
Objective: To investigate the personality and mental health of a soldier in a special forces unit. Methods: A total of 379 soldiers of a special soldier were randomly selected. Their personality traits and mental health were evaluated by EPQ and SCL-90, and compared with Chinese soldiers. Results: The score of E, P, N and E, P of scorers in all soldiers, first-class non-commissioned officers, second-class and above non-commissioned officers were significantly higher than those in China (P <0.01). There was no significant difference (P> 0.05) between the cover factor (L) of soldiers, compulsory soldiers, first-class non-commissioned officers and second-class non-official soldiers and Chinese soldiers. The scores of nine factors such as somatization, obsessive-compulsive disorder, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, terror, paranoia and psychosis among the soldiers, the compulsory service and the second-level and above sergeants were all significantly higher than those of the Chinese soldiers (P <0.01). Except for somatization and anxiety scores, the scores of seven factors in first-class non-commissioned officers were significantly higher than those in first-class non-communicative subjects, such as obsessive-compulsive symptoms, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, hostility, terror, paranoid and psychosis In Chinese soldiers norm (P <0.01). Conclusion: The soldier of a special soldier has a general personality trait and a low mental health level. Psychological intervention should be carried out.