论文部分内容阅读
近年来 ,我国各地法院受理的存单纠纷案件数量众多 ;而据有关部门统计 ,在我国诉诸法院的只是其中一小部分 ,还有为数不少的存单存在纠纷隐患。存单纠纷案件作为一种新型案件 ,案情较为复杂 ;加之司法部门在审理存单纠纷案时 ,除了依靠最高人民法院“法释[1997]8号”文外 ,还没有其它相应的法律规范可资依据。各地法院在如何适用法律解释上也不尽一致 ,造成同一类案件在不同的法院有不同的审理结果。这种现象引起了我国民法学界的极大关注。日前 ,我刊以在上海及浙江等地产生较大影响的“S公司诉G银行存单纠纷案”为例 ,特邀了中国人民大学、复旦大学、上海大学、同济大学、华东政法学院等多名民法专家 ,就该案中存在的问题及由此而引伸出的相关理论问题 ,展开了广泛和深入的探讨
In recent years, numerous cases of deposit and receipt disputes accepted by courts in various places in our country have been numerous. According to the statistics of relevant departments, only a small part of them have been brought to court in our country, and there are still many potential disputes over the deposit certificates. As a new type of case, disputes over deposit and receipt are more complicated. In addition, the judiciary, in addition to relying on the Supreme People’s Court’s “Fa [1997] No.8” texts, has no other relevant legal norms available for funding when handling disputes over certificates of deposit . Courts in various jurisdictions also have different ways of applying legal interpretation, resulting in different cases of hearing different courts in the same type of cases. This phenomenon has aroused great concern of civil law scholars in our country. Recently, I published a case of “S Company v. Bank G Depository and Receipt Disputes”, which had a great impact in Shanghai and Zhejiang, as an example, and invited many people like Renmin University of China, Fudan University, Shanghai University, Tongji University, and East China University of Politics and Law Civil law experts, on the case of the problems and the resulting extension of the relevant theoretical issues, launched a broad and in-depth discussion