论文部分内容阅读
检阅周采泉《杜集书录》及张忠纲《杜集叙录》等书目文献可发现,清初流传广泛的杜诗笺评多为钱谦益、汪琬、王士禛及朱彝尊等名家大著,大量的遗民诗人所作的评点辑注散佚较多。如潘柽章《杜诗博议》,因庄廷龙《明史》案发而禁废,后朱鹤龄《杜诗笺注》曾有所称引,但讳其姓氏~①。又桐城桂林方氏家族中方文、方拱乾、方苞及方贞观等皆曾批注杜诗,但因顺治江南科场案及《南山集》案,其著述也多在文禁之列。如果以身世出入为标准将清初期的杜诗评点学厘定为“朝”、“野”两大集群,那么,钱、王、朱等在朝名宦的评述多体现为权力文化对诗性的引导约束,而身处草野的遗民诗界更侧重于杜诗风云激荡的心灵历程~②。前者处于价值序列
A review of bibliographic references such as Zhou Juquan’s Duji Shulun and Zhang Zhonggang’s Du Jixu Lu recorded that many of the most widely circulated Du Shi articles in the early Qing dynasty were Qian Qianyi, Wang Jin, Wang Shizhen and Zhu Yizun, Comments made by the poet notes scattered loose more. For example, Panyu Zhang’s “Du Fu Bo Bian”, because of Zhuang Tinglong “Ming Shi” case and ban, after Zhu Helin “Du Shi Notes” had been quoted, but taboo its surname ~ ①. And Tongcheng Guilin, Fang’s family of Chinese, Fang Gonggan, Fang Bao and Fang Zhenguan, etc. have all endorsed Du Shi, but due to Shunzhi Jiangnan Section case and “Nanshan set” case, his writings are also more in text ban. If we take the experience of the whole world as the standard, we will define the two poems of “Du Fu” in the early Qing Dynasty as “North Korea” and “North”, then the comments of Qian, Wang and Zhu dynasties mostly embody the culture of power The poetic guidance and restraint, while those who live in Kusano’s poetry circles more focused on Du Fu’s turbulent spiritual journey ~ ②. The former is in value sequence