论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨应用Prolift盆底重建系统行保留子宫的全盆底重建术可行性及临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2009年1月~2012年2月吉林大学第一医院收治的40例POP患者的临床资料,其中15例应用Prolift盆底重建系统行保留子宫的盆底重建术为研究组,25例行传统TVH+阴道前后壁修补术为对照组,分析比较两组术中情况及术后疗效。结果:研究组围手术期情况与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P“,”Objective:To explore the feasibility and clinical efficacy of total pelvic floor reconstruction surgery with Prolift pelvic floor reconstruction system for treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse(POP).Methods:The clinical data of 40 POP patients who were treated in the hospital from January 2009 to February 2012 were analyzed retrospectively,then the patients were divided into study group and control group;15 patients in study group were treated with total pelvic floor reconstruction surgery with Prolift pelvic floor reconstruction system,and 25 patients in control group were treated with routine transvaginal hysterectomy(TVH) and repair surgery of vaginal wall;the intraoperative situations and curative effects in the two groups were analyzed and compared.Results:There was statistically significant difference in perioperative situations between study group and control group(P<0.05),no complications occurred in the two groups.The patients were followed up for 6-24 months;the objective curative rates in study group and control group were 100.0% and 86.7%,respectively.Uterine prolapse,vaginal wall prolapse of 40 patients were improved basically,but the quality of life after surgery in study group was better than that in control group.Conclusion:The curative effect of Prolift pelvic floor reconstruction surgery for treatment of POP is good,the recurrence rate is low,the quality of life of the patients is improved obviously,and the short-term curative effect is stable,but the long-term curative effect needs further observation.