论文部分内容阅读
反垄断损害赔偿诉讼在反垄断制度建构中具有越来越重要的地位。由于现实交易中因垄断行为遭受损害的受害人不太好确定、诉讼效率等因素,将发起反垄断损害赔偿诉讼的诉权配置给哪些主体需要法政策的权衡。美国因为其注重效率的法政策取向以及特殊的判例法制度,由一系列判例确立了间接购买者规则,一度排除了非直接购买者的起诉资格;而欧盟则基于其注重公平的法政策取向以及其既有的侵权法范式,从总体上进行立法规划,倾向于赋予间接购买者原告资格。结合中国的现有实定法及理论资源,建议在赋予间接购买者原告资格的基础上进行相关制度的构建。
Antitrust damage compensation litigation has become more and more important in the construction of antitrust system. Due to the fact that victims of monopolistic behavior are not well identified in the actual transactions and litigation efficiency and other factors, the litigation rights to initiate the antitrust damage compensation litigation should be weighed against which subjects need legal policy. Because of its efficiency-oriented legal and policy orientation and its particular jurisprudence, the United States established a series of indirect buyer rules by a series of jurisdictions that ruled out the indictment of non-direct buyers at one time. The EU, on the other hand, Its existing paradigm of tort law generally carries out legislative planning and tends to confer plaintiff status on indirect purchasers. Combined with China’s existing positive law and theoretical resources, it is suggested that the construction of the relevant system should be based on the qualification of the plaintiff as an indirect purchaser.