材料解析题以它特有的考查功能,备受青睐,题量日益增加,难度愈来愈大。几年来,考试材料题的比分不断加大,试题由浅入深,题量也由单一的材料发展到组合的系列材料,考查要求也由简单的记忆、再现发展到分析、比较、归纳、论证……,确是历史考试中最为棘手的题型之一。尽管如此,这种题型却愈益为广大师生所接受。我认为,历史材料题既能考查学生对基础知识的掌握程度,又能适当地深化和拓展教学内容,又有灵活迁移和变通的特点。题目所给的史料,未必都见于教材,但叙述的史实,又与教材密切相关。死记硬背书本,是做不好这类题的,从一定程度上来说,这 Material analysis questions with its unique test function, highly favored, increasing the number of questions, more and more difficult. Over the past few years, the score of the exam material problem has been constantly increasing, the test questions from the shallower to the deepest, the questions also from a single material to the combination of a series of materials, test requirements from simple memory, reproduction development to analysis, comparison, induction, demonstration ... ..., is indeed one of the most difficult questions in history exams. Nevertheless, this type of question is increasingly accepted by the majority of teachers and students. In my opinion, the historical material test can not only examine students' mastery of basic knowledge, but also appropriately deepen and expand their teaching contents as well as the characteristics of flexible migration and adaptability. The historical materials given by the title may not all be found in the teaching materials, but the historical facts of the narration are closely related to the teaching materials. Rarely endorsed books, is not doing such a problem, to a certain extent, this