江丹林在1992年第4期发表如题文章。作者从两个方面进行了引经据典的论证。文章认为:从性质上看,交往就是在一定历史条件下现实的个人、阶级、社会集团、国家之间物质、精神上互相往来、互相作用、彼此联系的活动。物质交往决定精神交往。交往是与生产相对应的范畴,它与生产关系不是同一个层次的概念。而“交往形式”、“交往方法”、“交往关系”这三个范畴含义是相同的,都是指生产关系,因此,交往与上述 Jiang Danlin in 1992 the fourth issue of the title article. The author has carried on the quotation evidence from two aspects. The article holds that: from the nature of the point of view, communication is the actual individual, class, social group under certain historical conditions, the material, spiritual interaction between countries, interact with each other, the activities of each other. Material interaction determines mental interaction. Communication is a category corresponding to production, and it is not a concept of production at the same level. However, the three categories of “forms of communication,” “methods of communication,” and “relations of contacts” have the same meaning and mean the relations of production. Therefore,