一我通常看一部电影,总是凭着这么两条感觉去评价其好与孬,一是故事,人物是否顺理成章。如失之偏颇,在剧场里就会“出戏”。二是,是否被感动,“情者文之径”,大凡能动人心弦者,我总是说好的。看南京电影厂的新片《蓝盾保险箱》,尽管故事曲折离奇,人物扑朔迷离,但上述的两条都不尽人意,尤其是合理性方面,已到了随意编撰的程度。剧中庞查礼这个人物的设计便属此例。当然,在惊险样式的片子中,允许故设疑团,使人物的面貌真伪难辨,让观众增加一种探索的兴味。过去看过的《尼罗河上的惨案》,船上每一个乘客似乎都有某一种可能驱使其成为杀人的凶犯,以后随着剧情发展,疑惑冰释,再回过头来想想以前的许多怀疑,却均顺理成章。可《蓝盾保险箱》一片,编导用不少细节去渲染庞查礼在办案过程中的不正常举动,试图引导观众对此人的怀疑。这种办法是很不高明的。人们要问,庞查礼凭什么要在“黑猫”酒醉之后,慌里慌张地拿着暖瓶夺门而去。他并不想干什么坏事,何以如此贼眼溜溜东张西觑呢? One I usually watch a movie, always with such two feelings to evaluate its good and bad, one is the story, the characters is a matter of course. If the loss of bias, in the theater will “play.” Second, whether it is touched, “Esoteric path of text,” Almost all moving heart, I always say good. See Nanjing Film Factory’s new movie “Blue Shield safe”, despite the twists and turns of the story twists and turns, confusing figures, but the above two are unsatisfactory, especially in terms of rationality, has reached the level of random compilation. Pangchali drama this character design is the case. Of course, in the breathtaking style of film, allowing people to set up suspicions so that the appearance of characters can not be discerned, so as to increase the audience’s interest to explore. The “tragedies on the Nile” seen in the past, every passenger on board seems to have some kind of murderer who may have driven it to become murderous later as the story developed, puzzled, and then come back to think of many of the previous doubts, but Are a matter of course. Can be “Blue Shield safe” a, director with a lot of detail to render Pang Zhaoli unusual in the process of handling the case, trying to guide the audience suspicion of this person. This approach is not very clever. People want to ask, Pang Zhaoli Why should “black cat” after drunk, panic, holding the thermos bottle away. He did not want to do any bad things, why so Zeropfalding Xiwanggu it?