我国法理学界通行以“四要件”来界定违法构成,将违法的主体、客体和主观方面纳入违法构成,不可避免地导致了逻辑上的循环论证;四要件之间的平面型结构,导致了理论上难以克服的缺陷。其实判断某一行为是否违法,从客观方面来考察即可。 The legal jurisprudence in our country defines the structure of illegality by means of “four elements”, and incorporates the subject, object and subjective aspects of illegality into the illegitimate structure, which inevitably leads to the logical circular argument. The planar structure between the four elements leads to the theory On the insurmountable defect. In fact, to judge whether an act is illegal, we can examine it from an objective perspective.