论文部分内容阅读
高中四册语文《庄暴见孟子》中,孟子曰:“臣请为王言乐。”课本注释为“请您让我给您讲讲关于欣赏音乐的事吧”。仔细分析文章却发现,这里不是言乐(yuè音乐),而是言乐(lè快乐)。在前,孟子连问:“独乐乐,与人乐乐,孰乐?”“与少乐乐,与众乐乐,孰乐?”齐王答曰:“不若与人(快乐)”、“不若与众(快乐)”。既如此,那么接下去谈关于快乐的事就是顺理成章的了。如果接下去只谈关于欣赏音乐的事,则显得前言不搭后语,文理不贯通。
In the high school four volumes of language, “Zhuang Zi see Mencius”, Mencius said: “Note please for the king of music. ” Textbook notes “Please let me tell you about listening to music”. Careful analysis of the article found that not here is the music (yuè music), but the music (lè happy). In the former, Mencius asked: “Dole Lele, with Lele, what music? ” “With Lele, Lele, Le Le?” Qi Wang said: “ People (happy) ”, “ not with the public (happy) ”. That being the case, it is logical to go on to talk about happiness. If you go on to talk about the matter of listening to music, it seems that the foreword does not take the words, arts and sciences do not work through.