论文部分内容阅读
1982年夏,欧洲共同体及其成员国就美国企图针对某些欧洲公司向苏联天然气管道工程供货而强施禁运措施作出了强烈反应。欧洲国家反对美国立法的域外效力以及它禁止履行禁运前合法缔结的合同义务的溯及既往效力。在欧洲共同体“对1982年6月22日出口管理条例修正案的评论”(以下简称“评论”)中,对这些异议做了非常详细的说明,评论已于1982年8月12日送交美国国务院。而后,1983年3月14日就同一问题又提出了一份备忘录。由于共同体作为美国的一个贸易伙伴和盟友所处的重要地位,这两个文件,特别是第一个具有非常重要的政治意义;同时由于其详细陈述了域外管辖权问题,又具有非常重要的法律意义。本文不想讨
In the summer of 1982, the European Community and its member states strongly reacted to the United States attempt to impose an embargo on the supply of certain European companies to the Soviet Union’s gas pipeline project. The extraterritorial effects of the European countries’ objection to U.S. legislation and the retroactive effect of the contractual obligations it legally concluded before the embargo was enforced. These objections were explained in great detail in the European Communities “Commentary to the Amendment to the Export Administration Regulations of June 22, 1982” (hereinafter “the Review”), which was reviewed on August 12, 1982 Send to US State Department. Then, on March 14, 1983, another memo was put forward on the same issue. Because of the importance of the community as a trading partner and ally of the United States, these two documents, and especially the first one, have very important political significance. In the meantime, they have very important laws because they elaborate on the issue of extraterritorial jurisdiction significance. This article does not want to discuss