论文部分内容阅读
快播庭审在互联网上引发了广泛的讨论,作为国内最受欢迎的播放器之一,快播CEO王欣在庭审中的自辩得到了了大批网友的同情与支持,甚至舆论对于快播呈现一边倒的态势。那么快播的工作原理是否涉及传播淫秽物品,快播公司是否具有利用淫秽视频牟利的目的,支持率极高的“技术中立论”是否能成为无罪理由,都是本案的关键点。一、案件回顾2013年11月18日,北京市海淀区文化委员会从位于本市海淀区的北京某技术有限公司查获快播公司托管的服务
Broadcast trial aroused a wide range of discussions on the Internet, as one of the most popular player, fast broadcast CEO Wang Xin in the trial of self-defense got a large number of users of sympathy and support, and even public opinion for the fast broadcast One-sided situation. So whether the principle of fast broadcasting involves the dissemination of obscene articles or whether the fast broadcasting companies have the purpose of using obscene videos for profit or not and the supportive high technology neutrality theory can become innocent grounds are all the key points in this case. I. Case Review On November 18, 2013, Haidian District Culture Commission of Beijing seized the service hosted by the fast-broadcasting company from a Beijing Technology Co., Ltd. located in Haidian District of this Municipality