论文部分内容阅读
随着我国经济的快速发展,经济法的适用范围也是越来越强,其法律效力也是越来越高,但是在社会经济问题的界定性互补上我国的经济法还存在着较大的缺失,一方面是表现在经济法法律伦理效力的缺失,一方面表现在民事经济纠纷当中的法律条约的缺失,导致现阶段我国实行的经济法法律体系不够健全,对于社会经济问题纠纷的界定性互补不够全面。因此就需要民法与经济法在社会经济纠纷当中相互配合,相互辅助,在共同的有效法律框架下,进行法律行为的判定,认清民法与经济法在不同法律原则下的基本差异。
With the rapid economic development in our country, the scope of application of economic law is also getting stronger and stronger, and its legal effectiveness is also getting higher and higher. However, there is still a big deficiency in the economic law of our country in defining and complementing social and economic issues. On the one hand, it is manifested in the lack of legal and ethical effectiveness of economic law. On the one hand, the lack of legal treaties in civil economic disputes leads to the fact that the legal system of economic law practiced in our country is not sound enough at this stage and the complementarity of the definitions of social and economic problems is not enough comprehensive. Therefore, it is necessary for civil law and economic law to cooperate with each other in the social and economic disputes and complement each other. In the common and effective legal framework, the legal acts should be judged, and the basic differences between civil law and economic law under different legal principles should be recognized.