论文部分内容阅读
亨利希对康德《纯粹理性批判》B版先验演绎所做的文本阐释奠定了所谓“一个论证两个步骤”的基调,阿里森扩展了亨利希对两个步骤划分依据的分析,丰瑟卡则认为前人的分析忽略了范畴和直观对象之间存在不一致的逻辑可能性。本文旨在说明:B版演绎“一个论证两个步骤”的划分依据是同一个模态算子对范畴规定的不同限定,并以此模型对相关文本做出新的诠释,提示先验演绎和物自身概念之间的关系,以期更好地理解康德先验演绎的特质。
Henrich’s textual interpretation of the transcendental deduction of version B of “Critique of Pure Reason” by Kant laid the tone of the so-called “two steps of one argument.” Allison expanded Henry’s analysis of the basis for the division of the two steps. Seka argues that previous analyzes ignore the logical possibility of inconsistencies between categories and visual objects. The purpose of this article is to show that the B version deduction “one argument two steps ” is based on the different modalities defined by the same modal operator and makes a new interpretation of the relevant texts by this model, suggesting a priori The relationship between deduction and the concept of matter itself, in order to better understand the characteristics of Kant’s transcendental deduction.