在集邮界有一个约定俗成的看法,谁拥有最丰富的收藏,谁占有最珍贵的邮票,谁就是集邮圈的“王”。不过似乎在中国集邮史上只有周今觉先生被较多的集邮者以“王”相称。这难道不是一个奇怪的问题吗?既然有了标准,那么每个时期,我们都可以搞个“邮王”出来嘛,或评、或选、或任命,总是可以比出个高下的。但是,为什么被称作“王”的人并不多呢?而且,这种现象不仅在集邮圈,在各个圈子里都是如 There is a common understanding in the philatelic community that whoever owns the most abundant collection, who occupies the most precious stamp, is the “king” of the philatelic ring. However, it seems that in the history of China’s stamp collecting, only Mr. Zhou Jinjue was commensurate with the more philatelic collectors for “Wang”. Is not this a strange question? Since there is a standard, then every period, we can engage in a “Postmaster” Come out, or evaluation, or election, or appointment, can always be higher than the next of. However, why is not so much called the “king”? Moreover, this phenomenon is not only in the philatelic ring, in all circles are like