论文部分内容阅读
目的对比显微技术和腹腔镜精索静脉结扎术后并发症的发生情况。方法 70例行精索静脉结扎术患者,随机分为对照组和观察组,各35例。对照组患者行腹腔镜精索静脉结扎术,观察组患者行显微技术精索静脉结扎术,比较两组患者的复发率及并发症发生情况。结果观察组患者术后并发症发生率明及复发率显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论显微技术下的精索静脉结扎术比腹腔镜精索静脉结扎术术后并发症发生率低,是一种安全有效的结扎术,有很强的临床推广价值。
Objective To compare the microsurgery and laparoscopic varicocele after the occurrence of complications. Methods 70 patients with varicocele ligation were randomly divided into control group and observation group, 35 cases each. The patients in the control group underwent laparoscopic varicocele ligation. The patients in the observation group underwent microsurgical varicocelectomy. The recurrence rate and complications of the two groups were compared. Results The incidence of postoperative complications and the recurrence rate in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusions The varicocele ligation under microscopy is more effective than laparoscopic varicocele in the incidence of postoperative complications. It is a safe and effective ligation and has strong clinical value.