陪审制度主要有两种不同模式,即陪审团模式和参审制模式。每种陪审模式的形成都离不开其独特的文化传统和社会因素,并受到所在国家社会治理结构模式及法治特点的影响。在历史演变中,陪审团模式和参审制模式从此消彼长转变为相互借鉴和融合。这两种陪审模式在制度运作、审理范围和审理成本、文化传统上有很大的不同,导致两种陪审模式差异明显,运作方式迥异。中国需要借鉴英美法系陪审团制度的优点,不断克服参审制的弊端,进一步明确法官与陪审员的分工,防止陪而不审;进一步扩大陪审员的范围,促进司法民主和司法公正;进一步丰富陪审案件的类型,实现陪审案件的多元化;强化当事人对陪审员的选择权,使当事人对陪审员的知情权得到保障;杜绝陪审员庭审前阅 Jury system mainly has two different modes, namely jury mode and participation mode. The formation of each jury model is inseparable from its unique cultural traditions and social factors, and by the country where the structure of social governance patterns and the rule of law characteristics. In the historical evolution, the jury model and the participatory juridical model have changed from one to another to learn from each other and integrate. The two jury models have very different traditions in terms of system operation, scope of trial and trial costs, and cultural traditions, resulting in obvious differences between the two jury models and their different modes of operation. China needs to draw lessons from the merits of the Jury system in Anglo-American legal system, continuously overcome the disadvantages of the reference system, further clarify the division of labor between judges and jurors and prevent it from being tried without trial; further expand the jury scope and promote judicial democracy and judicial fairness; further Enrich the types of jury cases and realize the diversification of jury cases; strengthen the parties ’right to choose the jury and ensure the parties’ right to know the jury members;