论文部分内容阅读
王某是“全玻璃窗墻”實用新型專利~1的專利權人,其授權萬變窗墻公司實施該專利,並以該公司名義對各種侵權行爲進行維權。萬變窗墻公司在雲貴川渝等地發起了多場專利訴訟。例如,僅在2014年9月,昆明中院就受理了1500件這樣的訴訟~2。這些訴訟有一個共同特點:絕大多數被告並非玻璃窗墻的同業製造商或銷售商,而是服務業的經營者,如網吧、美容院、藥房、餐廳、賓館、百貨商場等。這是正當維權,還是濫用專利權?業界觀點不一,即使在《最高人民法院關於審理侵犯
Wang is a patentee of the “All-glass Window Wall” utility model patent ~ 1, which authorizes the ever-changing window wall company to implement the patent and defends all kinds of infringement in the name of the company. Varying window wall company in Yunnan and Guizhou and other places launched a number of patent litigation. For example, in September 2014 alone, Kunming Intermediate People’s Court accepted 1,500 such proceedings2. The lawsuits have one thing in common: the overwhelming majority of defendants are not traders or marketers of glass walls, but service providers such as Internet cafes, beauty salons, pharmacies, restaurants, hotels, department stores and the like. Is this a legitimate defense or a misuse of patent rights? The opinions of the industry vary from one case to another. Even though the Supreme People’s Court