论文部分内容阅读
一般认为,“拍卖”一词和其所代表的“公开公平竞价”的交易方式是标准的“舶来品”。诚然,我们今天所熟知的国内拍卖,无论从形式、程序甚至内容组成上都极大地借鉴了英式拍卖的流程。但是,就拍卖活动本身而言,却不是绝对的“舶来品”——我国早在魏晋南北朝时期就有这种类似的交易方式了,当时因与捐赠僧侣僧衣相关而得名“唱衣”。即便就“拍卖”一词本身,也早在唐代就正式出现在典籍中:唐玄宗二十五年(公元737年)的《通典》中载“诸以财物典质者,经三年不赎,即行拍卖”。之所以很多人持有这样的印象,是因为“拍卖在上世纪90年代初才重新发迹于中国内地”。所以,1949年至上世纪90年代左右的大段拍卖历史让很多人淡忘。在今天,艺术拍卖俨然成为收藏与艺术品经济的核心焦点。于是就有了一场关于艺术品市场“中华第一槌”的争论,它究竟发生在哪个城市,以什么样的标注来判断?时间之谜成为“中华第一槌”之争的导火索。
It is generally accepted that the term “auction” and the “open fair auction” it represents are the standard “exotic”. Admittedly, the domestic auction, as we know it today, draws heavily on the flow of the British auction, both in form and procedure and even in its content composition. However, as far as the auction itself is concerned, it is not absolute “exotic” - China had such a similar transaction pattern as early as during the Wei, Jin, Northern and Southern Dynasties when it was named after singing monks clothes“. Even the term ”auction“ itself, as early as the Tang Dynasty officially appeared in the classics: twenty-five years of the Emperor Xuanzong (AD 737) After three years without redemption, the auction line ”. The reason why many people hold such an impression is because “the auction was only rekindled in mainland China in the early 1990s.” Therefore, a lot of people forgotten the large auction history from 1949 to the 1990s. Today, art auctions have become the core focus of the collection and art economy. So there was a controversy over the art market “China’s first gavel”, which city it happened and what kind of annotation to judge? Time mystery became the “China’s first gavel” dispute The fuse.