朱敬同志的「口罩」是一篇抄袭得来的作品,我们已经收到一些对这事情加以揭发的信件和文章。下面发表的他的一篇检讨,显然还不够深刻。但他的检讨态度应该说还是诚恳的。我们希望他以后能够切实改正。必须说明,虽然开始学习写作时难免摹仿,但是一个人要想在写作上有前途,首先就应该独立地直接表现自己所要表现的生活,工人同志更应该从工人自己的生活出发,从生活中寻求题材、表现方法等等,不能「依赖摹仿」;对于初学写作者的指导,应该做的是必须告诉他们一些必要的创作上的基本原则,教会他们注意这些原则在实际写作中的运用,帮助他们总结写作经验,也不能简单地告诉他们就从摹仿开始。何况摹仿和抄袭是有一条显明的界限的,朱敬同志在「口罩」问题上,已经超过了摹仿的界限。此外,朱敬同志提到的朱昌绪和李怀发两位同志的文章,因字数较多,所以我们在这里没有发表。他们的文章里,是提到了朱敬同志「对『创作』二字认识不够」的。我们感谢大家的帮助。为根绝抄袭行为而斗争罢! Comrade Zhu Jing’s “mask” is a plagiarized piece of work, and we have received some letters and articles on this matter. The following one of his reviews, apparently not enough profound. However, his review should be honest or sincere. We hope he can correct it in the future. Must be stated, it is inevitable imitation although started to learn writing, but a person in order to have a future in writing, first of all you should independently a direct manifestation of what you want to show life, comrade workers should From the worker’s own life, to seek from life theme, performance methods, etc., can not “rely on imitation”; for the novice writer’s guide, should do is to have to tell them the basic principles on the creation of the necessary, teach them the observance of these principles in the actual writing, helping them Summarize the writing experience, can not simply tell them to start from the imitation. Moreover, there is a clear boundary between imitation and plagiarism. Comrade Zhu Jing has exceeded the boundary of imitation on the issue of “masks.” In addition, Comrades Zhu Changxu and Li Huai-fa mentioned the articles by Comrade Zhu Jing because of the large number of words, so we did not publish them here. In their article, they mentioned that Comrade Zhu Jing “did not know enough about the word” creation ". We thank everyone for your help. Fighting for eradicating plagiarism!