论文部分内容阅读
通过加工分离程序分离重复编码和提取练习对有意记忆和熟悉性的不同促进,从记忆成分的角度解释测试效应。以大学生为被试,采用2(记忆方式:SSS、STT)×2(测试间隔:5分钟后、1周后)×2(测验类型:包含测验、排除测验)的混合设计。结果发现:(1)在即时测试中,重复编码与重复测试在对有意记忆(外显)成分的贡献上基本一致,前者的成绩好于后者是由于重复编码相对而言提高了熟悉性(内隐)成分。(2)在延时测试中,熟悉性成分基本未发生变化,重复测试的成绩好于重复编码是由于前者相对而言提高了回忆中的有意记忆成分。
Separation of repetitive coding and extraction exercises by processing separation programs Different promotion of intentional memory and familiarity explains the test effect from the perspective of memory composition. Undergraduates were taken as subjects, and mixed design of 2 (memory: SSS, STT) × 2 (test interval: 5 minutes after 1 week) × 2 (test type: inclusion test, exclusion test) The results showed that: (1) In the real-time testing, repeated coding and repeated testing were basically the same in terms of contribution to intentional memory (explicit) components. The former’s performance was better than the latter due to the increased familiarity due to repeated coding Implicit) composition. (2) In the delay test, the familiar components basically did not change. The results of the repeated tests were better than the repeated codes because the former improved the memory components intentionally.