论文部分内容阅读
罗尔斯、诺齐克、沃尔泽分别发展出各自的分配正义思想。罗尔斯强调了无条件的完全平等和有条件的不完全平等的统一:诺齐克论述了持有正义是进行分配和行使国家职能的前提;沃尔泽概括了各个领域各有其自己的正义原则。三位关于分配正义思想存在着方法论的不同;对经济自由的态度不同;平等与自由的侧重点不同;国家是否应该接受和贯彻分配原则的观点不同;分配原则是否存在唯一性的认识不同;对权利的重视程度不同。
Rawls, Nozick and Walzer developed their own ideas of the distributive justice. Rawls emphasizes the unconditional complete equality and the conditional incomplete equality: Nozick discusses the premise that holding justice is the distribution and exercise of state functions; Walzer outlines that each area has its own justice in principle. There are differences in methodology between the three ideas about the distribution of justice; different attitudes towards economic freedom; different points of emphasis on equality and freedom; different opinions on whether or not the state should accept and implement the principle of distribution; differences in the uniqueness of the principle of distribution; Different degrees of emphasis on rights.