论文部分内容阅读
把社会效益和经济效益作为一组对等的范畴,讨论其对立统一,严格说来是不科学的,因为经济效益也是社会效益的一种。由于约定俗成,“社会效益”和“经济效益”的概念在多年使用中已经确定了自己的含义,继续作为对等范畴使用,已不致引起混乱。出版工作多年困扰于社会效益和经济效益的矛盾。所谓困扰,主要是困扰于社会效益好、经济效益不好的出版活动。双效益的,不困扰;经济效益好、社会效益一般的,不困扰;经济效益好、社会效益不好的出版物,一般是依法处治,也不存在困扰问题。
It is strictly unscientific to regard social benefits and economic benefits as a set of equivalence categories to discuss the unity of opposites because economic benefits are also a kind of social benefits. As a result of common practice, the concepts of “social benefits” and “economic benefits” have already established their own meanings over many years of use and their continued use as a reciprocal category has not caused any confusion. Publishing work for many years plagued the contradictions between social and economic benefits. The so-called distress is mainly disturbed by the publication of social benefits, economic benefits are not good. Double benefits, not disturbing; economic benefits, social benefits in general, not disturbed; good economic returns, poor social benefits of publications, generally according to the law, there is no problem of distress.