论文部分内容阅读
我国刑法学界已经形成了形式解释论和实质解释论之争,但是这种学术之争建立在大量误读的基础上。形式解释论和实质解释论都是一种双重限制的定罪思路,区别仅仅在于形式判断和实质判断的先后顺序不同,但这也就决定了形式解释论更加符合刑法理论的需要。在解释刑法时,应当按照一定的操作路径:首先,先进行文义解释、体系解释和历史解释;其次,再进行目的解释。
China’s criminal law scholars have formed a formal explanation of the theory and substantive interpretation of the debate, but this academic battle is based on a large number of misreading. Both formal interpretation and substantive interpretation are a kind of double-limit criminal conviction. The only difference is that the order of formal judgment and substantive judgment is different, but this also determines the need of formal interpretation theory more in line with criminal law theory. When interpreting the criminal law, we should follow certain operational paths: Firstly, firstly we should carry out the explanation of the text, the explanation of the system and the explanation of the history; secondly, explain the purpose.