论文部分内容阅读
日前,中国卷入的两起WTO争端案件——中国原材料案和中国稀土案——引起了国际社会的广泛关注。而在这两个案件中,争议最为突出的问题就是《中国入世议定书》与WTO协议的关系问题。对此,笔者将自洽性理论引入条约解释,并结合如下两个问题验证专家组和上诉机构有关“入世议定书”解释的相关结论的逻辑自洽性:(1)“入世议定书”中所列义务的可强制实施性——其与争端解决机制的关系问题;(2)“入世议定书”与相关WTO协议的关系。
Recently, two WTO-related dispute cases involving China - the case of raw materials from China and the case of rare earths from China - aroused widespread concern in the international community. In these two cases, the most controversial issue is the question of the relationship between the “Protocol on China’s accession to the WTO” and the WTO agreement. In this regard, the author introduces the self-consistent theory into the treaty interpretation and combines the following two issues to verify the logical consistency between the panel and the appellate body on the relevant conclusions of the WTO Protocol: (1) (2) The relationship between the “WTO accession protocol” and the relevant WTO agreement.