罗事先生《论辞书编纂中采用伪典小说的问题》一文使用了“伪典”、“伪典小说”的概念,并指出了辞书编纂中采用伪典小说应注意的词目收录、词语释义、词义书证等问题。我们认为;“伪典”概念的提出有待商榷;罗文来分清“伪典小说”与“伪书”二者概念;作者关于辞书词语立目所提出的意见在辞书的编纂中不太现实;该文多处将词汇与词语两个术语混用。 Luo’s article “On the Use of Pseudo-Classical Novels in the Compilation of Lexicographical Papers” uses the notion of “pseudo-classical” and “pseudo-classical novels” and points out the dictionaries that should be paid attention to when adopting pseudo-classical novels in the compilation of dictionaries Included, word paraphrase, the word meaning card and other issues. We think that the proposition of the concept of “pseudo-code” is open to question; the concept of both the “pseudoclassic novels” and the “pseudo-books” is distinguished by Luo Wen; the author’s opinions on the dictionaries of dictionaries are not in the compilation of dictionaries Too realistic; the article mixed vocabulary with two terms.