论文部分内容阅读
火化遇上堵心事 近日,浙江省衢州市柯城区法院对 开化县殡葬管理所不服衢州市工商局对 其处罚6万元行政诉讼一案,当庭作出 一审判决,判决认为:衢州市工商局的处 罚决定事实清楚,证据确凿,适用法律准 确,程序合法,遂依法判决予以维持。这 是近年来衢州市第二起自备骨灰盒不给 火化事件引发的行政官司。 2003年5月31日,丧户郑全贵自 备骨灰盒到开化县殡葬管理所《下称殡管 所)为亡故的父亲火化,遭到拒绝。该所表 示,必须购买殡管所提供的骨灰盒方能 进行遗体火化。郑全贵说:“这个骨灰盒 是父亲生前看中的。”但殡管所置之不 理,无奈之下他只好从殡管所购买了标 价268元的骨灰盒,在办完火化手续后, 仍用自备骨灰盒为老人的骨灰下葬。
Conflict encountered confrontation Recently, Quzhou City, Zhejiang Province, Kecheng District Court on the management of funeral funeral in Quzhou City, Quzhou City Trade and Industry Bureau to punish the case of 60,000 yuan in administrative litigation, court made a first instance verdict, the verdict: Quzhou Trade and Industry Bureau Punishment decision clear facts, evidence is conclusive, applicable law is accurate, the procedure is legal, then according to the law to be maintained. This is the second case of Quzhou City in recent years do not give cremated cremation case of administrative lawsuits. On May 31, 2003, his deceased father, Cheng Zhenggui, who owned his own coffin, went to cremate the funeral and funeral management office of Kaihua County for cremation and was rejected. The agency said cremation of the body must be possible by purchasing an urn provided by the funeral director. Cheng Quan-Gui said: “This urn was a father’s lifetime fancy.” But the funeral director ignored him. Instead, he had to buy an urn with a price of 268 yuan from the funeral director. After completing the cremation procedure, he still used Own urn burial for the ashes of the elderly.