论文部分内容阅读
目的 探讨Er∶YAG激光和传统涡轮手机治疗龋齿的方式方法,观察对比其疗效,为临床实践提供参考指导.方法 筛选98例龋齿患者作为临床研究对象,分设激光治疗组和涡轮手机治疗组,两组各49例,分别采用Er∶YAG激光和传统涡轮手机进行治疗.结果 激光治疗组患者术前、术中的血压和心率无明显变化,疼痛感轻,涡轮手机治疗组患者术前、术中的血压和心率出现了明显的变化,疼痛感明显,说明Er∶YAG激光治疗龋齿舒适度更高;激光治疗组患者的术后牙齿过敏发生率明显低于涡轮手机治疗组;在治疗的成功率方面,激光治疗组患者显著高于涡轮手机治疗组.结论 相比于传统涡轮手机而言,采用Er∶YAG激光治疗龋齿,可有效改善治疗过程当中的舒适性,降低术后牙齿过敏发生率,提高治疗成功率,值得加强临床推广与实践.“,”Objective To explore the Er∶YAG laser in the treatment of dental caries and traditional turbine method,to observe its curative effect.Methods 98 patients with dental caries were randomly divided into turbine and laser groups,49 cases in each group.Laser treatment group were treated by the Er∶YAG laser,the other group with traditional turbine.Results Compared with the turbine treatment group,the laser treatment group feel more comfortable with lower incidence of postoperative sensitive teeth.Conclusion Compared with traditional turbine,the use of Er∶YAG laser treatment of dental caries can effectively improve the treatment process and comfort,reduce the incidence of postoperative sensitive teeth,worth of clinical promotion and practice.