近年来,关于我国螺钿起源问题的研究有了新进展。其主要标志是:人们不仅抛弃了古人“螺填器出倭国(日本)”的旧说,而且也不再囿于他国学者主张的由印度传入我国的推论,开始以自身的物质文化资料进行探索并提出了新见解。这个变化的原因在于田野考古发现许多螺钿实物,证实古人的说法是错误的,他国学者的意见更是靠不住的。依据新的材料,文物考古工作者对我国螺钿的起源提出三种看法:一、螺钿是在唐代金银平脱基础上演化来的;二、南北朝时期开始有螺钿漆器,中唐以后才趋于成熟;三、镶嵌蚌制物的漆器大量出土于西 In recent years, there has been new progress on the research on the origin of snail in China. Its main hallmark is that not only did people abandon the old saying that the ancient “puller was out of Wogyo (Japan)”, but also no longer relied on the inferences made by other scholars in India and started to use their own material and cultural materials Explore and put forward new ideas. The reason for this change is that many archaeological discoveries in field archeology confirm the ancients’s assertions as erroneous, and the opinions of other scholars are even more unreliable. According to the new materials, archaeologists of cultural relics put forward three opinions on the origins of snail in China: First, snail was evolved on the basis of gold and silver in the Tang Dynasty; Second, lacquer lacquer ware began to be used in Southern and Northern Dynasties, ; Third, a large number of embedded lacquer ware unearthed in the West