中西方创意教育的差异之一:左脑型的思辨、批评培养,理论课程目的性和本质性的差异在所有的西方艺术和设计教育中,“批评”(criticism)是作为非常重要的课程提出了的,这个课程核心是批判、分析能力的培养,基础是对艺术、设计的了解和认识。有些艺术院校对理论课程要求得比较突出,包括美学(Aesthetics)、本体论(ontology)、语义学(semantics)、现象学(phenomenology),也突出工作室实践(称之为:studio praxis,是培养观察能力的工作室:empiricalinvestigation)。这些课程在越来越多艺术院校中开设。目的性很明确,就是要提高学生的创意思维能力。简单一点说:创意思维的培养,在两方面:史论方面的大幅度提高和强调,具体设计课程中导师的引导;而解决问题能力、创造能力 One of the differences between Chinese and Western creative education: Left-brain speculation, critical training, theoretical course objectives, and essential differences In all Western art and design education, “criticism” is very important Curriculum proposed, the core of this course is critical, analytical skills training, based on art, design understanding and understanding. Some art colleges require more theoretical courses, including Aesthetics, ontology, semantics, phenomenology, and studio practice (call it studio praxis) Workshop for developing observational skills: empirical investigation. These courses are open in more and more arts colleges. The purpose is very clear, is to improve students’ creative thinking ability. Simply put: the cultivation of creative thinking, in two aspects: a substantial increase in the history of theory and emphasis on the guidance of the specific design course mentor; and problem-solving skills, ability to create