民主测评是一项较为细致而严肃的工作。但在民主测评过程中,以下几种情况如有不慎,有可能出现不真实和不公正的结果。首先,从参评人员方面来看,参评人员的政治素质差,喜欢拉帮结派或奉承拍马,有可能影响测评的真实、公正。比如参评人员受非组织行为的操纵,就很可能出现为某些工作无所事事、为人阳奉阴违、遇事推诿绕道、自身形象差的干部脸上“涂粉”;对某些处事公道、诚实为人、踏实工作的好干部泄私愤,图报复,给其脸上“抹黑”。再如参评人员的文化素质低,不能理解测评项目中的含义,或有的不能填写测评表,同样可能出现不真实的结果(这在村级测评时有发生)。其次,从被测评人员方面来看,为人耿直正派、处事公道的干部由于在工作中不免得罪少数人,而测评 Democracy assessment is a more detailed and serious work. However, in the course of democratic appraisal, the following situations may result in untrue and unfair results if inadvertently. First of all, from the perspective of the participants, the political quality of the participants is poor. They like to pull the knot or flatter their flanks, which may affect the trueness and fairness of the assessment. For example, participating staffs are subject to the manipulation of non-organizational behavior and are likely to appear to be “masculine” on the cadres’ faces who are obscene and overbearing by their own affairs and who have poor self-image. Practical work of good cadres vent their anger, figure revenge, to his face “discredit ”. Another example is the assessment of staff members of the cultural quality is low, can not understand the meaning of the evaluation project, or some can not fill in the evaluation form, the same may be unrealistic results (which occurred at the village level evaluation). Second, judging from the personnel being assessed, cadres who are upright and impartial in their work and who are impartial in their work have been assessed for their ability to offend a handful of people at work