论文部分内容阅读
在其他国家和地区的刑事诉讼中,当事人具有上诉利益是提出上诉的实质要件,“无利益,不上诉”是判断上诉合法与否的标准,对不合法的上诉,法院裁定予以驳回。社会伦理规范、诉讼经济原则、诚实信用原则等共同构成了刑事上诉利益的理论基础。我国《刑事诉讼法》缺乏上诉实质要件和上诉利益审查制度的规定,相关研究几近空白,实践中不加任何限制的上诉在增加诉累、浪费司法资源的同时,导致二审庭审时出现“控辩错位”的异常现象。为消除以上弊端,应当借鉴其他国家和地区相关制度的经验,增加上诉实质要件的规定,明确上诉合法性的判断标准,从而推动刑事上诉利益审查制度的中国式建构。
In other countries and regions, criminal proceedings, the parties have the appeal to appeal is the essence of the appeals, “no interest, no appeal ” is to determine the legal validity of the appeal, the unlawful appeal, the court ruled to be rejected. Social ethics, economic lawsuit principle, the principle of good faith and credit jointly constitute the theoretical basis for the interests of criminal appeals. China’s “Criminal Procedure Law” lacks the substantive elements of the appeal and the system of censorship of interests. The relevant research is almost blank. In practice, without any restrictions, appeals increase the number of litigation and waste of judicial resources, resulting in the appearance of “ Dispute control accused ”anomaly. In order to eliminate the above drawbacks, we should learn from the experience of other countries and regions, increase the provisions of the substantive elements of the appeal, and clarify the criteria for determining the legality of appeals so as to promote the Chinese-style construction of the review system of criminal appeals.