白内障超声波乳化吸出法和玻璃体灌注吸引切割法,都是近十多年来眼科手术的两个突出新进展。本文作者在采用上述两种方法治疗白内障的过程中,对外伤性白内障25例,其中超声法10例,玻切法15例,详细观察其手术操作之难易,术中及术后的合并症,手术效果等加以比较,得出下述几点体会。超声法: 优点是速度快,本文最长者为10分钟,最短者为1分40秒。缺点是手术操作要求高,不能差之毫厘。与传统方法全异,须从头学起,常需改大 Cataract ultrasonic emulsification aspiration and vitrectomy perfusion and cutting method are two prominent new advances in ophthalmic surgery in the past decade. In the process of using the above two methods to treat cataracts, the authors of this study found that there are 25 cases of traumatic cataract, including 10 cases of ultrasound and 15 cases of vitrectomy. We observed the difficulty of operation, the intraoperative and postoperative complications , Surgical effects to be compared to draw the following experience. Ultrasound: The advantage is fast, the longest 10 minutes for this article, the shortest for 1 minute 40 seconds. The disadvantage is the high surgical requirements, not the slightest difference. Different from the traditional method, we must learn from scratch and often need to change the size