论文部分内容阅读
无论运用哪种写作理论进行写作教学,课堂活动都离不开教师所做的作文批改、集中讲评这两个环节。批改活动一般在课下做,是隐性的,针对的是特定学生的具体问题,而讲评则是将评阅结果显性化,主要针对的是共性的问题。两个环节缺一不可。本文主要对三部教材的批改方式进行比较,在基于过程教学法及任务教学法的理论基础上,建议增加评阅循环过程,螺旋式上升,最后拿出成品。并提出几条原则:书面评语不能模糊无信息,要有可操作性;重视学生之间的互评;个评之后要及时总评;利用电脑优势修改作文。
No matter what kind of writing theory to use for writing teaching, classroom activities are inseparable from the teacher's essay modification, focus on these two aspects. Correctional activities are generally done under the class, is implicit, is specific to the specific problems of students, while the comment is to review the results of explicit, mainly for the common problem. Two links are indispensable. This article mainly compares the way of correcting the three textbooks. Based on the theory of process teaching method and task teaching method, it is suggested to increase the reviewing cycle, spirally rising, and finally to take out the finished product. And put forward a few principles: Written comments can not be fuzzy without information, have maneuverability; emphasis on mutual assessment between students; a comment on the timely general comment; use computer advantage to modify composition.