论文部分内容阅读
在铁路货盗案件的定案过程中,尤其是在盗窃犯罪团伙供出的积案中,被告人的有罪供述,即口供,在整个证据链中占有至关重要的地位。对于团伙犯罪中仅有被告人的一致的、没有相互矛盾的、取证程序合法的供述而没有其他物证的案件,能否定案?我们认为,既要坚持“只有被告人供述没有其他证据不能定案”的原则,也要根据具体案件情况灵活掌握。同时,遏制刑讯逼供,既要有一系列的制度保障,要合理科学地设置举证责任,也应当理性对待口供的证据价值。
In the course of finalizing the case of railway robbery, especially in the case of stolen criminal gangs, the defendant’s guilty plea, that is, confession, plays a crucial role in the chain of evidence as a whole. Can we decide whether a case of a gang crime in which there is only a consistent, non-contradictory and evidence-based legal testimony of the defendant without any other material evidence? We think it is necessary to uphold the principle that “only the accused’s confession can not be finalized without other evidence ”Principle, but also according to the specific circumstances of the case flexible. At the same time, to curb the extortion and torture by torture requires both a series of institutional guarantees, a reasonable and scientific way to set the burden of proof, and the rationale of confession evidence.