论文部分内容阅读
方之光、毛晓玲因对学术动态不够了解,将潘旭澜批评太平军的两篇文章当作是整个学术界“否定农民起义”思潮的标志。他们没有看到,批评太平军、否定农民起义的不只是潘旭澜一人,而是众多的中外学者。这些学者认为,农民起义不仅没有所谓的革命性,没有推动历史前进,而且对中国社会起到极大的危害作用。“否定农民起义”思潮的产生表明,以往的研究存在着严重的缺陷,农战史专题需要改造和创新。
Fang Zhiguang and Mao Xiaoling, due to their lack of understanding of the academic developments, regarded Pan Xulan’s criticism of the Taiping’s two articles as a symbol of the academic trend of “denying peasant uprisings”. They did not see and criticized the Taipings, denied that the peasant uprising was not just Pan Xulan but a large number of Chinese and foreign scholars. These scholars believe that the peasant uprising not only did not have the so-called revolutionary nature, did not promote the progress of history, but also greatly jeopardized the Chinese society. The emergence of the ideological trend of “denying the peasant uprising” shows that there are serious flaws in the past research and that the topic of the history of peasant war must be reformed and innovated.