为论证其裁决具有正当性,法官需要为其运用证人证言等证据形成案件事实的正当性提供理由,这能够在一定程度上倒逼庭审的实质化。为此,法官需要在分析听众、选择合适的起点后,有条理地展现其对证人证言的运用。法官需要论证其对证人证言的相关性、可采性及可信性的分析,展现其运用证人证言的推论过程。在此过程中,法官需要以法律、经验和逻辑为基础,使其认定过程和结果具有可接受性。 In order to prove that the ruling is justified, the judge needs to justify the factual application of witness testimony and other evidence to form the case, which can to a certain extent forcing the trial substantive. To this end, judges need to analyze the audience, select the appropriate starting point, an orderly display of their use of witness testimony. Judges need to demonstrate their relevance, admissibility and credibility analysis of witness testimony and demonstrate the corollary of their use of witness testimony. In the process, judges need to be based on law, experience and logic to make their identification process and outcome acceptable.