论文部分内容阅读
城市低保工作的家庭收入测算由“应得收入”改按“实际收入”后,总体上扩大了保障范围,提高了保障水平,增强了保障力度,有力地保证了城市贫困人口的基本生活。但在实际工作中,低保工作者虽然竭力把关,但“应得收入”与“实际收入”之间的予盾、差距很难把握。比如,工人六个月领不到工资可以申请低保,债务方就以有低保维持其生活为由,放松了支付工人工资的迫切性。再如,养子女不赡养父母、继父母不抚养子女、离异夫妻双方不互相抚养,政府给予了生活保障,从思想上和行为上导致了这类应得收入的无限拖延或不了了之。另
The calculation of the family income of urban subsistence allowances working from “income deserved income” to “actual income” has generally expanded the scope of protection, raised the level of protection and enhanced the guarantee so as to effectively guarantee the basic living conditions of the urban poor. However, in practical work, although the minimum security workers strive to check, the gap between the “deserved income” and “real income” is difficult to grasp. For example, workers who claim wages for six months can apply for subsistence allowances. The debtor has relaxed the urgency of paying workers' wages on the ground of having their subsistence allowances maintained. In another example, if the adopted children do not support their parents, step-parents do not raise their children, and the divorced husband and wife do not support each other, the government has provided life support and has ideally and behaviorally led to such unlimited delay or indefinable income. another